Ontario supreme court decision on laws that protect us against whoring
The title of this post is purposely inflammatory, the reason I used it is to provide balance against the media's intent to sanitize the so-called trade from any connection to human trafficking. So as long as they refer to a "landmark decision" instead of calling it a controversial decision, I'll continue to refer to the "trade" for what it is, human trafficking.Now let me digress.
The appeal by the government will be successful for the following reason. The plaintiff based their argument on a matter of not having a choice as the law was forcing them to take their whoring underground.
No choice, that's the tipping point.
If they had no choice, its not the law that's the problem, its that they choose this lifestyle, if the counter argument is that they had the lifestyle forced on them or that they where forced into the trade, then its a clear case of human trafficking, also against the law.
What the plaintiff will be forced to do is explain to the court how being a whore is right, and those girls who say they are being forced into sexual slavery are liars.
My preference of course is for the government to table a non confidence motion to use the NWS clause. Love to see the opposition fight an election on that one. Odds are the liberals would find a way to let it pass using the fig leaf defence.
Labels: the free lunch crowd at it again
posted by gimbol @ 3:43 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home