Friday, January 18, 2008

Planted questions I'd like to hear.

"Senator Clinton, if you are successful in your campaign for President, will your husband be a member of your cabinet?"

"Mr Dion, if combat troops are withdrawn from Afghanistan, how does that keep the Taliban from regaining control of the country?"

"Mayor Miller, how do you adjust to a lower standard of living resulting from increased taxation?"

""Mr McGuinty, if native occupiers are not removed, doesn't that create two-tier justice?"

Labels:

Monday, November 19, 2007

Quotes to hang on to

First:

"Mulroney sued the government and received a $2.1 million settlement and an apology after the then-Liberal government wrote the Swiss government in 1995 and alleged that Mulroney and Schreiber might have been involved in a kickback scheme involving the Airbus deal. In defence of his government's settlement with Mulroney in 1997, Chretien said he had no choice but to accept his fellow former-PM's account of events. "The former prime minister swore that he never had any business with Mr. Schreiber. We could not prove the contrary, so the RCMP looked like they made a mistake," Chretien told reporters. "

Odd the way Chretien recalls these events, his government wrote a letter accussing Mulroney of taking a bribe, but somehow its the RCMP's fault. Its also odd that during that same interview Chretien feels an inquiry is the wrong way to go. Wonder what it is he's got to hide? Or is it that he wants to avoid going on the stand and being cross examined by Mulroney's lawyers?

Second:

"A Taliban commander in the district, reached by telephone, dismissed the government toll as lies but acknowledged that his men had suffered casualties."

Could we ask that if the G&M has information on the location of Taliban (such as a phone number that can be traced) that they reveal same to the people fighting them.
Its a bit troubling to say the least that unnamed Taliban are able to get quoted by a major daily down playing our success in the field. Guess the Globe and Mail didn't get the memo that these guys are the enemy.

Labels:

Sunday, October 28, 2007

The Red Star just can't help it if its a liberal shrill

They publish a story with this byline

Elections Canada probing Tory advertising scheme that claimed rebates for `in and out' transactions

The part that derails this story is this quote.

"All federal political parties depend on this rebate to help finance the next election."

All parties do this. If the CPC is guilty so to are all the others.

BTW Elections Canada, I you don't seem to be too actively pursuing the guitly party over the tax payer dollars embezzled to fund more than one liberal election campaign in Quebec.
You might want to be careful lest someone find the smoking gun or a pidgeon ready to squeal.

Labels:

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Looking for info

None of these stories are true unless someone can validate them.

What I'm looking for is information:

On a developing story that there is some rancour in the CTV newroom over who is going to be replacing Robertson when he retires. Present status lie, everyone knows Lloyd has no intention of retiring.

That the CBC is looking to split the lead anchor of the National so that Mansbridge has to share it with someone that is bi-lingual or female. Present status lie.

That the Star is going to be axing some of its employees to stop the flow of red ink. Present status lie.

That the Globe and Mail is being looked at as the next Rupert Murdoch (sp?) acquisition. Present status lie.

These will be updated as infomation becomes available, or if its possible to take them to an absurd level to create some satire.
Any enterprising individuals that want to run with them be my guest.

Labels:

Friday, May 25, 2007

In light of recent events

Namely these.

First was President Bush's success in getting through to the cut and run crowd that he will not hold the military to a political timetable.

Second, to PM Harper who made it clear to the media that the mission in Afghanistan isn't about photo ops its the right thing to do.

To the Lebanese government. That has made it clear to the terrorists that they have only two options.

To Charles Adler, who was able to strip away a major pollsters thin veneer of legitamacy by revealing the pollsters bias.

To the media that has decided not to drink the koolaid and start questioning the folks that plead poverty.

I think these lyrics are a best reflection of these events.

Well I wont back down, no I wont back down
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
But I wont back down

Gonna stand my ground, wont be turned around
And Ill keep this world from draggin me down
Gonna stand my ground and I wont back down

Hey baby, there aint no easy way out
Hey I will stand my ground
And I wont back down.

Well I know whats right, I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin me around
But Ill stand my ground and I wont back down

Hey baby there aint no easy way out
Hey I will stand my ground
And I wont back down

No, I wont back down

Labels:

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Media bais

There was one statement that stood out as blatant hypocracy in this article.

"(Politicians) who talk to us should know that what they're saying will be used by media people," said Richard Brennan, gallery president and a reporter for the Toronto Star. "They should know that it is not going to be used against them in an attack ad."

Really?

Is this the same Toronto Star that has in the past written some extremely negative articles about Mr Harper? And is this not the same press gallery president that has insisted that gallery reporters sign his list and not the PM's if they want to ask a question during meetings with the PM?

That or its just sour grapes.

Labels: